Authority precedes action
Consequential permission must already exist outside the worker seeking to act.
Governance · public overview
ANANS separates capability from consequential permission. Authority comes from outside the worker seeking to act; ambiguous or missing authority does not become permission; released claims leave evidence that can be inspected afterwards.
Ability is not permission. Success is not authority.
A stronger model, a successful prior run, or a compelling rationale cannot manufacture consequential permission.
Consequential permission must already exist outside the worker seeking to act.
Missing, expired, or out-of-scope authority produces refusal rather than silent widening.
Released governance claims include reviewable evidence sufficient to inspect the admitted claim.
The public model is deliberately minimal.
EXTERNAL PURPOSE + CONSEQUENTIAL AUTHORITY
↓
GOVERNANCE DECISION
↓
BOUNDED ACTION
OR REFUSAL
↓
REVIEWABLE EVIDENCE
CAPABILITY != AUTHORITY
REFUSAL IS A VALID OUTCOMEThe current containment-proof repository publishes a bounded released claim and the evidence required to inspect it. A released proof does not turn the public repository into a specification for unreleased ANANS machinery.
The current release is tied to a specific bounded claim and version.
The verifier exists to reproduce the released claim, not to disclose future proof-development strategy.
The release explicitly excludes broader conclusions not supported by its evidence.
ANANS publishes what is necessary to inspect an admitted public claim. Unreleased implementation details, internal test strategy, development artifacts, credentials, and non-public project material remain private by default.
The public claim remains bounded to the released evidence.